Monthly health report
System health, the incidents of the month and what caused them, and the optimization opportunities found, written to be read by someone who was not in the room.
MySQL estates rarely degrade gently. They run fine until transaction volume, replication lag, or a schema change on a large table makes them stop. Fortified Data runs MySQL environments and does the scaling work, read replicas, partitioning, and replication topology, ahead of that point rather than during it.
MySQL and MariaDB, self-hosted and managed cloud.
Fortified Data provides managed services, consulting, and assessments for MySQL and MariaDB, covering monitoring and incident response, query optimization and index tuning, replication and clustering including multi-source and geographically distributed topologies, read replicas, sharding and partitioning, connection pooling, backup and point-in-time recovery, security hardening with encryption and privilege management, version upgrades and migrations, and deployment automation, on self-hosted instances and on Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, and Azure Database for MySQL.
MySQL is the platform most likely to have been set up by the application team rather than by a DBA, and to have run untouched for years afterwards because nothing obliged anyone to look at it. That works until the transaction volume changes, and then everything that was deferred arrives at once.
This page states what Fortified Data does on MySQL rather than what MySQL is. The supported deployments, the scaling work, and the deliverables are below.
Six areas, covered continuously under a managed service and individually as project work.
Continuous monitoring with alerting on performance, security, and system anomalies, and remediation attached to the alert rather than a notification nobody owns.
Slow query analysis, index strategy, and server configuration tuning, run as continuous work rather than as a response to a complaint about the application.
Replication topology design and management, including multi-source and geographically distributed arrangements, clustering, and failover configuration that has been tested.
Backup strategy with point-in-time recovery, verification that jobs completed, and recovery testing that establishes the backups restore rather than that they ran.
Encryption, access control and user privilege management, vulnerability assessment, and regular security patching, applied without costing throughput.
Horizontal and vertical scaling strategy, read replica and sharding design, version upgrades, and migrations onto MySQL from legacy or commercial engines.
Deployments, topologies, and scaling
MySQL and MariaDB are supported self-hosted and as managed cloud services on Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, and Azure Database for MySQL. The managed variants take over provisioning, backups, and patching. They do not design a replication topology, decide what belongs on a read replica, or notice that a table has grown past the point where an online schema change is safe.
Most MySQL problems presented as performance problems are topology problems. Reads and writes are competing on one instance, a replica is lagging far enough to serve stale data, connection handling is exhausting resources before the queries do, or a table needed partitioning two years ago. Fortified Data treats the topology as a design with a diagram and a rationale rather than as an accumulation of decisions nobody wrote down.
Evidence, on a cadence, in writing. On MySQL the topology map is the document clients most often discover they never had.
System health, the incidents of the month and what caused them, and the optimization opportunities found, written to be read by someone who was not in the room.
A measured baseline, then every tuning change recorded with what it altered and what it produced, so an improvement can be proved rather than asserted.
What replicates to what, in which direction, with what lag tolerance, and what happens to each path during a failover. Written down rather than reconstructed during an incident.
Confirmation that backup jobs completed, and point-in-time recovery tests with their results, which is the difference between a backup strategy and a backup schedule.
Data growth analysis with the scaling route named: read replicas, partitioning, sharding, or more hardware, each costed rather than described.
Accounts, privileges, and encryption settings reviewed against what the application actually needs, which on a long-running MySQL estate is rarely what it has.
Read replicas, partitioning, and sharding are cheap to plan and expensive to retrofit under load. They are scoped from growth analysis rather than from an incident review.
A topology that grew one decision at a time behaves unpredictably during a failover, which is the only time it matters. Fortified Data documents it, tests it, and redesigns it where it cannot hold.
The two diverge in ways that matter to replication, storage engines, and upgrade paths, and an estate that runs both gets one team that knows where the differences bite.
Self-hosted MySQL and MariaDB on premises and on cloud infrastructure, and the managed services Amazon RDS for MySQL, Google Cloud SQL for MySQL, and Azure Database for MySQL. Mixed arrangements across self-hosted and managed instances are supported as one environment.
By establishing which limit has been reached first. Read replicas separate read traffic from write traffic, partitioning and sharding address table and dataset size, connection pooling addresses resource exhaustion that looks like slow queries, and vertical scaling addresses the cases where none of those is the constraint. Fortified Data measures the workload before recommending one, because the four have very different costs and only one of them is usually the answer.
Yes. Replication lag, failed or stalled replicas, inconsistent data between primary and replica, and failover behavior that has never been tested are routine Fortified Data work. The engagement normally produces a documented topology alongside the fix, because a replication problem in an undocumented topology recurs in a different place.
Yes. Version upgrades are planned with compatibility testing in a staging environment and a documented rollback plan before any production change. Where the replication topology allows it, replicas are upgraded and promoted so that the interruption is a planned failover rather than an outage, and the plan states which category the upgrade falls into before it is made.
Yes. Migrations onto MySQL from legacy systems and from commercial engines are run as fixed-scope engagements covering schema and data type mapping, application code conversion, row-level validation against the source, and a tested rollback path at every phase. Moves off MySQL onto another platform are run the same way.
User accounts and privileges against what the application actually requires, encryption in transit and at rest, patch currency against known vulnerabilities, and audit logging. Long-running MySQL estates commonly accumulate accounts with more privilege than the application ever needed, which is the finding that appears most often.
The same MySQL team, engaged three different ways.
We run your environment, with 24/7 monitoring, maintenance, and proactive improvement.
A guaranteed 15-minute emergency response plus monthly on-demand hours that bank when unused.
Project-based engagements for migrations, performance tuning, data modernization, business intelligence, and high availability and disaster recovery.
A health check documents performance, availability, security, and growth headroom across every instance, and produces a prioritized list of what to fix first. On MySQL it usually produces the first accurate picture of the replication topology as well.
Let us show you what's possible.